KARAKTERISTIK BENTANGLAHAN ARKEOLOGI DI WILAYAH LASEM, JAWA TENGAH

  • Andi Putranto Departemen Arkeologi Fakultas Ilmu Budaya Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta
Keywords: Bentanglahan arkeologi, Lasem, Citra satelit, Q-geographic information system, Digital elevation model

Abstract

Studi bentanglahan arkeologi atau bentang arkeologi ditujukan untuk mengetahui bentuk dan pola persebaran data arkeologi pada suatu bentanglahan fisik tertentu. Wilayah Lasem di Jawa Tengah merupakan suatu kawasan yang dikategorikan sebagai suatu bentang arkeologi, yang anasir pembentuknya berupa bentanglahan fisik sebagai lokasi keberadaannya. Dalam upaya mendapatkan variabel-variabel yang dapat menjadi penentu kriteria suatu bentanglahan arkeologi, maka perlu penelitian mendalam tentang karakteristik bentanglahan di kawasan Lasem. Dengan demikian, dapat diketahui sejauh mana keterkaitan variabel-variabel tersebut sebagai faktor pendorong perkembangan budaya di wilayah Lasem. Sintesis penelitian berdasarkan data bentanglahan dan kesejarahan wilayah Lasem menunjukkan bahwa kawasan tersebut mengandung dua karakteristik bentang arkeologi yang dilandasi, a) aspek kronologi atau pendekatan waktu, yaitu periode Klasik, Islam, dan Kolonial; b) aspek ekologi yang berkaitan dengan keletakannya pada suatu topografi dan bentuklahan. Berdasarkan atas fungsinya, karakteristik bentang arkeologi dari tiga periodisasi tersebut, dapat dikelompokkan dalam kategori fungsi-fungsi ekonomi, sosial, politik, dan budaya.

The study of archaeological landscapes aims to determine the shape and distribution pattern of archaeological data on a particular physical landscape. The Lasem area in Central Java is a region that is categorized as an archaeological landscape, whose constituent elements are physical landscapes as its location. To obtain variables that can determine the criteria for an archaeological landscape, it is necessary to carry out in-depth research on the characteristics of the landscape in the Lasem area. Thus, to what extent these variables are related to the driving factors of cultural development in the Lasem region can be understood. Based on the landscape and historical data of the Lasem area, the research synthesis shows that this region contains two characteristics of the archaeological landscape which are established by aspects of a) chronology or approach to time, which are the periods of Classic, Islamic and Colonial; and b) ecology, relating to its location in topography and landforms. Based on their functions, the characteristics of archaeological landscapes from the three periods can be grouped into economic, social, political and cultural functions.

References

Atabik, Ahmad. 2016. “Harmonisasi kerukunan antar etnis dan penganut agama di Lasem.” Fikrah: Jurnal Ilmu Aqidah dan Studi Keagamaan 4(1): 36-49. DOI: 10.21043/fikrah.v4i1.1511.

Abbas, Novida, Siswanto, Sugeng Riyanto, T.M. Hari Lelono, T.M. Rita Istari, Gunadi Kasnowihardjo, M. Chawari, Priyatno Hadi S.,Indah A.N., Masyhudi, Sambung Widodo, Hery Priswanto, Alifah, Putri Novita T., Agni S.M., Hadi Sunaryo, Tedy Setiadi, R. Aji Satrio, Andreas E.A., Z. Dekon Suyanto, Didik Santoso, Jiono, dan Ngadimin. 2011. “Identifikasi Potensi Sumberdaya Arkeologi Di Kecamatan Lasem, Kabupaten Rembang, Provinsi Jawa Tengah”. Laporan Penelitian Arkeologi. Yogyakarta: Balai Arkeologi Yogyakarta.

Bebermeier, W., et al., 2013. “Landscape and Archaeology”. Quaternary International http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.quaint.2013.09.003

Calvo-Iglesias, Marĺa Silvia, RamÓn Alberto Dĺaz-Varela, Gonzalo Méndez-Martínez, and Urbano Fra-Paleo. “Using place names for mapping the distribution of vanishing historical landscape features: The agras filed system in Northwest Spain.” Landscape Research 37(4):501-517. DOI: 10.1080/01426397.2011. 604716.

Carvalho, Mariana, Sagrario Fernández, Laura Pujia, Charles Rocha, Carlos Rodríguez, Flavia Zelli. 2013. “Architecture, archaeology and landscape, an interdisciplinary educational experience in archaeological sites.” Procedia Chemistry 8: 292-301. DOI: 10.1016/j.proche.2013.03.036.

David, Bruno and Harry Lourandos. 1999. “Landscape as mind: Land use, cultural space and change in North Queensland Prehistory.” Quaternary International 59:107-23. DOI: 10.1016/S1040-6182(98)00074-3.

Fairclough, Graham. 2003. “The long chain: Archaeology, historical landscape characterisation and time depth in the landscape.” Pp. 295-318 in Landscape Interfaces: Cultural Heritages in Changing Landscapes editor Palang, Hannes and Gary Fry. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Farina, Almo. 1998. Principle and Methods in Landscape Ecology. Toward a Science of Landscape. Cambridge: Chapman & Hall.

Gamble, C. 2001. Archaeology: The Basics. London: Routledge.

Gunawan, Y., Y.F. Rachim., dan C. Fabiano. 2008. “Leksikon arsitektur Lasem: Studi perbandingan rumah Jawa, Cina, dan Kolonial. Hlm. 57-73 dalam Pertemuan Arsitektur Pantai Utara Jawa: Cirebon, Tegal, Pekalongan, Semarang, Lasem, Tuban, editor Salura, P., dan Y. Gunawan. Bandung: Cipta Sastra Salura.

Hu, Di. 2012. “Advancing theory? Landscape archaeology and geographical information systems.” Papers from the Institute of Archaeology (PIA) 21:80-90. DOI: 10.5334/pia.381.

Ingold, Tim. 1993. “The temporality of landscape.” World Archaeology. Conceptions of Time and Ancient Society 25(2): 152-74. DOI:10.1080/00438243.1993.9980235.

Kartodirdjo, Sartono. 1999. Pengantar Sejarah Indonesia Baru 1500-1900 M: Dari Imporium sampai Imperium. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Kienast, F. 1993. "Analysis of Historic Landscape Patterns with a Geographical Information System a Methodological Outline." Landscape Ecology 8(2): 103-118

Kusnawan, Moh. Abi. 2011. “Perekonomian Etnis Thionghoa di Kota Lasem Tahun 1940-1950.” Skripsi. Semarang: Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Kusters, K. 2017. Lanskap Cerdas-Iklim dan Pendekatannya. Bogor: Tropenbos Indonesia.

Maulana, T.R., Wulan, E.Siswanti, D.S. Wahyuningsih, A.D.W. Rahmadana, M.D. Putra, 2016. “Analysis Of Land Capability In Alluvial Plain And Volcanic Slope Of Rembang District Using Landforms Approach”. Pp. 252-259 in Proceedings. The 2nd International Conference of Indonesian Society for Remote Sensing. Yogyakarta: PUSPICS Faculty of Geography UGM and MAPIN.

Novitasari, D. A. 2015. "Spatial Pattern Analysis Dan Spatial Autocorrelation Produk Domestik Regional Bruto (Pdrb) Sektor Industri Untuk Menggambarkan Perekonomian Penduduk di Jawa Timur." Jurnal Ekbis, 13.(1): 629-637. https://doi.org/10.30736/ekbis.v13i1.113

Nas, P. J. M., dan Pratiwo. 2002. "Java and de groote postweg, la grande route, the great mail road, Jalan Raya Pos." Bijdragen Tot de Taal-, Land- En Volkenkunde / Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia 158(4): 707–725. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-90003763

Plachter, Harald and Mechtild Rössler. 1995. “Cultural landscape: Reconnecting culture and nature.” In von Droste, Bernd., Harald Placher, Mechtild Rössler, eds. Cultural Landscape of Universal Value. Jena: Gustav Fischer.

Rippon, Stephen. 2007. “Historic Landscape Characterisation: Its Role in Contemporary British Archaeology and Landscape History.” Landscapes 8(2): 1-14. DOI:10.1179/lan.2007.8.2.1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/lan. 2007.8.2.1

Scherr, Sara J., Seth Shames, and Rachel Friedman. 2013. “Defining Integrated Landscape Management for Policy Makers.” Ecoagriculture Policy Focus 10:1-7.

Septirina, Safiera Nur, Ozawa Takeo, and Kaku Satoru. 2016. “Conservation of historical architecture in Malioboro Street, Yogyakarta City, Indonesia.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 225: 259-269. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.06.025

Spulerova, Jana, Marta Dobrovodská, Juraj Lieskovsky, Andrej Baca, Andrej Halabuk, F. Kohút, Matej Mojses, Pavol Kenderessy, Veronika Piscova, P. Barančok, Katarína Gerhátová, J. Krajčí, Martin Boltiziar. 2011. “Inventory and classification of historical structures of the agricultural landscape in Slovakia.” Ekológia 30(2):157-170. DOI10.4149/ekol_2011_02_157

Simensen, Trond, Rune Halvorsen, and Lars Erikstad. 2018. "Methods for landscape characterisation and mapping: A systematic review." Land Use Policy 75:557-569. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.04.022

Turner, Monica G. and Robert H. Gardner. 2015. Landscape Ecology In Theory And Practice: Pattern and Process. Second Edition. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Turner, Sam. 2012. “Landscape archaeology.” Pp 131-142 in The Routledge Companion to Landscape Studies, editor Howard, Peter, Ian Thompson, and Emma Waterton. London: Routledge,.

Unjiyam, M. A. 2014. Lasem Negeri Dampoawang. Yogyakarta: Salma Idea.

Utomo, Bambang Budi. 2009. "Majapahit dalam Lintas Pelayaran dan Perdagangan Nusantara." Berkala Arkeologi 29(2):1-14.

Warnock, Stephen. and Geoffrey H. Griffiths. 2015. “Landscape characterisation: The living landscapes approach in the UK.” Landscape Research 40(3): 261-278. DOI: 10.1080/01426397.2013.870541

Winarno, E. 2012. Carita Sejarah Lasem : Gubahanipun R. Panji Kamzah Tahun 1858, Katurun R. Panji Karsono Tahun 1920, Kantor Perpustakaan dan Arsip, Rembang. http://ebook.perpus.jatengprov.go.id/ data_upload2019/CARITASEJARAHLASEM/mobile/html5forpc.html

Yamin, R and K. Bescherer Metheny, eds. 1996 Landscape Archaeology: Reading and Interpreting the American Historical Landscape. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.

Yunus, Hadi Sabari. 2010. Metode Penelitian Wilayah Kontemporer. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Published
2022-12-27
How to Cite
Putranto, A. (2022). KARAKTERISTIK BENTANGLAHAN ARKEOLOGI DI WILAYAH LASEM, JAWA TENGAH. Naditira Widya, 16(2), 135-148. https://doi.org/10.24832/nw.v16i2.481