PERMAKAMAN BELANDA PENELEH SURABAYA: ARTI KHUSUS DAN POTENSINYA SEBAGAI PUSAT PEMBELAJARAN DAN REKREASI [PENELEH DUTCH CEMETERY IN SURABAYA: ITS SIGNIFICANCE AND POTENTIAL AS A LEARNING AND RECREATION CENTRE] The Important Value of Surabaya Peneleh Dutch Cemetery

Main Article Content

Lengkong Sanggar Ginaris
Widya Nayati

Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas arti khusus yang terdapat pada permakaman Belanda Peneleh di Kota Surabaya. Permakaman Belanda Peneleh dipilih sebagai objek penelitian karena permakaman tersebut memiliki makam dan prasasti lama dengan berbagai bentuk dan usia yang relatif utuh. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengetahui arti khusus yang terdapat pada permakaman Belanda Peneleh. Berdasarkan arti khusus yang terdapat pada makam Belanda Peneleh dapat dipahami cara kita menjaga, melindungi dan mengembangkannya. Data tentang nilai penting diperoleh dari hasil pengamatan lapangan dan studi pustaka, baik tentang kompleks makam maupun yang berkaitan dengan kota Surabaya kuno serta tentang perkembangan agama di Surabaya. Data dianalisis lalu diintepretasi untuk mengetahui arti khusus dari permakaman Belanda Peneleh. Data nisan yang bisa dibaca dianalisis tentang bahannya, kondisi kerusakan, isi inskripsi yang ada, serta hiasan yang digunakan. Data tersebut dikorelasikan dengan data sejarah yang diperoleh dari kajian pustaka. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa permakaman Belanda Peneleh memiliki arti khusus sejarah, ilmu pengetahuan, agama, dan kebudayaan yang dapat digunakan sebagai bahan pembelajaran untuk masyarakat. Dengan adanya penelitian ini, diharapkan bahwa permakaman Belanda Peneleh dapat dimanfaatkan untuk kepentingan pendidikan yang dapat diakses semua kalangan dan memberi pemahaman mengenai sejarah, masyarakat, dan budaya orang-orang Belanda di Indonesia, serta relevansinya pada masa sekarang.

This study discusses the significance of the Peneleh Dutch Cemetery in Surabaya. The Peneleh Dutch Cemetery was chosen as the object of research due to the feature of old tombs and inscriptions, in various shapes and ages, that are relatively complete. The purpose of this study was to determine the special meaning of the Peneleh Dutch Cemetery. The significance of the Peneleh Dutch Cemetery may enlighten on the means to protect and develop it. Data on the importance of value were obtained from field observations and literature studies, both about the tomb complex and those related to the ancient city of Surabaya as well as about the development of religion in Surabaya. The data were analyzed and then interpreted to find out the special meaning of the Peneleh Dutch Cemetery. The legible data of the headstones were analyzed with regard to the material, the condition of damage, the content of the inscriptions, and the decorations. The data were compared to historical data extracted from literature reviews. Analysis results suggest the Peneleh Dutch Cemetery has special historical, scientific, religious, and cultural meanings that can be used as learning materials for the community. It is hoped that the Dutch Cemetery can be used for educational purposes that can be accessed by all groups and provide an understanding of the history, society and culture of the Dutch people in Indonesia and their relevance today.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ginaris, L. S., & Nayati, W. (2021). PERMAKAMAN BELANDA PENELEH SURABAYA: ARTI KHUSUS DAN POTENSINYA SEBAGAI PUSAT PEMBELAJARAN DAN REKREASI [PENELEH DUTCH CEMETERY IN SURABAYA: ITS SIGNIFICANCE AND POTENTIAL AS A LEARNING AND RECREATION CENTRE]: The Important Value of Surabaya Peneleh Dutch Cemetery. Naditira Widya, 15(2), 113-128. https://doi.org/10.24832/nw.v15i2.430
Section
Articles

References

Anshcuetz, Kurt, Richard. H. Wilshusen, dan Cherie Sheick. 2001. “An Archaeology of The Landscape: Prespective and Directions.” Journal of Archaeology Research 9(2):157–211.

Aritonang, Jan Sihar, dan Karel Steenbrink. 2008. A History of Christianity in Indonesia. Vol. 35. Leiden: Brill.

Artha, Y. A., Antariksa, dan S. Hariyani. 2006. “Studi Pelestarian Bangunan Kuno Di Kawasan Kampung Kuno Peneleh Surabaya.” Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Teknik 18(1):86–94.

Barsteld, H. .. 1899. “No Title.” Soerabaiasch Handelsblad, 1.

Daly, Patrick, Edmund Edwards McKinnon, R. Michael Feener, Tai Yew Seng, Ardiansyah, Parnell Andrew,

Nizamuddin, Nazli Ismail, Kerry Sieh, and Jedrzej Majewski. 2019. “The Historic Trading Port of Lamri on the

North Sumatran Coast.” Bulletin de l’École Française d’Extrême-Orient 105:115–44.

Deetz, J. 1967. “Death’s Head, Cherub, Urn and Willow.” Natural History 76:29–37.
von Faber, Godfried Hariowald. 1931. Nieuw Soerabaia: De Geschiedenis van Indies Voornaamste Koopstad in de
Eerste Kwarteeuw Sederthare Instelling 1906-1931. Surabaya: N.V. Boekhandel en Drukkerij H. van Ingen.

Faber, Von G. H. 1933. Oud Soerabaia, De Geschiedenis Van Indie’s Earste Koopstad Van de Oudste Tijden Tot de Intelling Van Den Gemeentateraad. Surabaya: N.V. Kon. Boekhandel en Drukkerijen G. Kolff & Co.

Francis, Doris, dan Ken Worpole. 2003. Last Landscapes: The Architecture of the Cemetery in the West. Vol. 31. London: Reaktion Books.

Ginaris, Lengkong Sanggar. 2019. “Pergeseran Letak Permakaman Belanda Di Kota Surabaya Dari Abad Ke 18 Hingga Awal Abad Ke 20.” Berkala Arkeologi 39(2):183–200.

Graaf, S. de, and D. G. Stibbe. 1918. “Merkus (Mr. Pieter)” edited by W. C. . Wintgens. Encyclopaedie van Nederlandsch Indie.

Hammatt, Heather. 2001. “Grave Matters.” Landscape Architecture Magazine 91(10):60–63.

Harvey, Thomas. 2006. “Sacred Spaces, Common Places: The Cemetery in the Contemporary American City.” Geographical Review 96(2):295–312.

De Indische Courant. 1925. “De Eerste Artistieke Show Room in Ned.-Indië Op Marmergebied.”

Karman, Yongky. 1990. “Manusia Dan Kematian.” Jurnal Pelita Zaman 5(1):50–55.

Knight, G. Roger. 2014. Sugar, Steam and Steel: The Industrial Project in Colonial Java, 1830-1885. Adelaide: University of Adeliade Press.

Magetsari, Noerhadi. 2016. Prespektif Arkeologi Masa Kini Dalam Konteks Indonesia. Jakarta: Penerbit Kompas.

Mahendrani. 2013. “Nisan Makam Belanda Peneleh Surabaya : Kajian Tentang Bentuk Dan Ragam Hias.” Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Muller, Stephen. 2015. “Colonial Experiences of Death, Burial and Memorialisation in West Terrace Cemetery, Adelaide: Applying a Phenomenological Approach to Cultural Landscapes in Historical Archaeology.” Australasian Historical Archaeology 33:15–26.

Mytum, Harold. 1989. “Public Health and Private Sentiment: The Development of Cemetery Architecture AndFunerary Monuments from the Eighteenth Century Onwards.” World Archaeology 21(2):283–97.

Pearson, Michael, and Sharon Sullivan. 1995. Looking After Heritage Place ; The Basics of Heritage Planning for Managers, Landowners, and Administrators. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

Pecsek, Brigitta. 2015. “City Cemeteries as Cultural Attractions : Towards an Understanding of Foreging Visitors Attitude at The National Graveyard in Budapest.” Deturope : The Central Journal of Regional Development and Tourism 7(I):44–61.

Pemerintah Kota Surabaya. 2016. Profil Kota Surabaya.

Poldevaart, A. 1933. “De Nieuwe Europeesche Begraplaats Te Bandoeng.” Locale Techniek 2(4):6–10.

Prawesthi, Ashri, Cynthia Puspitasari, and Margaret Arni Bayu Bayu. 2020. Tempat Pemakaman Umum Yang Indah Dan Aman Sebagai Upaya Penyediaan Ruang Terbuka Hijau Sebuah Kota (Studi Kasus : TPU Bekasi).

Salmon, Claudine. 2016. “Ancient Chinese Cemetery of Indonesia as Vanishing Landmark of The Past (17th-20th C.).” Archipel 92:23–61.

Simonds, John Ormsbee, dan Barry Starke. 2006. Landscape Architecture ; A Manual of Environmental Planning and Design. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Suratminto, Lilie. 2014. Makna Sosio-Historis Batu Nisan VOC Di Batavia. Vol. 11. Jakarta: Wedatama Widya Sastra.
Texas Historical Commission. 2008. “Preserving Historic Cemeteries.” History News 63(3):1–8.

Veit, Richard F., Sherene B. Baugher, and Gerard P. Scharfenberger. 2009. “Historical Archaeology of Religious Sites and Cemeteries.” Historical Archaeology 43(1):1–11.